On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Yee, Guang <guang....@hpe.com> wrote:
> Can you please elaborate on "granularity of policy support within > Ironic."? Is there a blueprint/etherpad we can take a look? > See the lack of granularity expressed by Ironic's current policy file: https://github.com/openstack/ironic/blob/5671e7c2df455f97ef996c47c9c4f461a82e1c38/etc/ironic/policy.json > > > Guang > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Devananda van der Veen [mailto:devananda....@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 10:25 AM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack][keystone][ironic] Use only > Keystone v3 API in DevStack > > We (the Ironic team) have talked a couple times about keystone /v3 support > and about improving the granularity of policy support within Ironic. No one > stepped up to work on these specifically, and they weren't prioritized > during Liberty ... but I think everyone agreed that we should get on with > the keystone v3 relatively soon. > > If Ironic is the only integrated project that doesn't support v3 yet, then > yea, we should get on that as soon as M opens. > > -Devananda > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Davanum Srinivas <dava...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Short story/question: > > Is keystone /v3 support important to the ironic team? For Mitaka i guess? > > > > Long story: > > The previous discussion - guidance from keystone team on magnum > > (http://markmail.org/message/jchf2vj752jdzfet) motivated me to dig > > into the experimental job we have in devstack for full keystone v3 api > > and ended up with this review. > > > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/221300/ > > > > So essentially that rips out v2 keystone pipeline *except* for ironic > jobs. > > as ironic has some hard-coded dependencies to keystone /v2 api. I've > > logged a bug here: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic/+bug/1494776 > > > > Note that review above depends on Jamie's tempest patch which had some > > hard coded /v2 dependency as well > > (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/214987/) > > > > follow up question: > > Does anyone know of anything else that does not work with /v3? > > > > Thanks, > > Dims > > > > -- > > Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > ____ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Unsubscribe: > > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev