On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Kyle Mestery <mest...@mestery.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Anne Gentle < > annegen...@justwriteclick.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:15 PM, John Griffith <john.griffi...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Doug Hellmann <d...@doughellmann.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Excerpts from Morgan Fainberg's message of 2015-09-17 12:51:33 -0700: >>>> >>>> > I think this is all superfluous however and we should simply encourage >>>> > people to not wait until the last minute. Waiting to see who is >>>> > running/what the field looks like isn't as important as standing up >>>> and >>>> > saying you're interested in running. >>>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> Doug >>>> >>>> >>>> __________________________________________________________________________ >>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>>> Unsubscribe: >>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>>> >>> >>> My dog ate my homework... >>> My car wouldn't start... >>> I couldn't figure out what UTC time was... >>> >>> The guidelines seemed pretty clear: >>> Any member of an election electorate can propose their candidacy for the >>> same election until September 17, 05:59 UTC >>> >>> That being said, a big analysis on date/time selection etc doesn't >>> really seem warranted here or harping on the fact that something 'went >>> wrong'. I as a TC member have no problem saying "things happen" and those >>> that have submitted candidacy albeit late and are unopposed are in.. no >>> muss no fuss. I *think* we're all reasonable adults and don't know that >>> anybody had in mind that the TC would arbitrarily assign somebody that >>> wasn't even listed as a PTL for one of the mentioned projects. >>> >>> >> It's not so simple for Magnum, with 2 late candidacies. We'll figure it >> out but yes, we have work to do. >> >> > It could be simple: Let magnum have an election with both candidates. As > Monty said: > +1 Also, not the second submitter stated they only submitted because they noticed nobody else was running. Regardless seems easy enough to deal with. > > "... this is a great example of places where human judgement is better > than rules." > > Thanks, > Kyle > > >> Anne >> >> >> Moving on, >>> John >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> __________________________________________________________________________ >>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>> Unsubscribe: >>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Anne Gentle >> Rackspace >> Principal Engineer >> www.justwriteclick.com >> >> __________________________________________________________________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: >> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev