On 09/30/2015 10:41 PM, melanie witt wrote: > On Sep 30, 2015, at 14:45, Andrew Laski <and...@lascii.com > <mailto:and...@lascii.com>> wrote: > >> I have a slight preference for #1. Nova is not buggy here novaclient >> is so I think we should contain the fix there. >> >> Is using the v2 API an option? That should also allow the 3 extra >> parameters mentioned in #2.
It could be, but it would invalidate the claim that operators can just point people at v2.1 and it won't be noticed. > > +1. I have put up https://review.openstack.org/229669 in -W mode in case > we decide to go that route. > > -melanie As the concensus is for item #1, I'm fine with that. +2 on https://review.openstack.org/229669. Let's get that landed and cut a new release today. -Sean -- Sean Dague http://dague.net __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
