On 9 October 2015 at 08:47, Steven Dake (stdake) <std...@cisco.com> wrote: > Kolla operators and developers, > > The general consensus of the Core Reviewer team for Kolla is that we should > embrace a liberal backport policy for the Liberty release. An example of > liberal -> We add a new server service to Ansible, we would backport the > feature to liberty. This is in breaking with the typical OpenStack > backports policy. It also creates a whole bunch more work and has potential > to introduce regressions in the Liberty release. > > Given these realities I want to put on hold any liberal backporting until > after Summit. I will schedule a fishbowl session for a backport policy > discussion where we will decide as a community what type of backport policy > we want. The delivery required before we introduce any liberal backporting > policy then should be a description of that backport policy discussion at > Summit distilled into a RST file in our git repository. > > If you have any questions, comments, or concerns, please chime in on the > thread.
I'll try to get to that session - I'm drafting https://review.openstack.org/#/c/226157/ at the moment, which while its aimed at clients and libraries is at least in the same discussion space.... -Rob -- Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev