In that case I would suggest to also use Keystone service directory for 
discovering services.

> 9 жовт. 2015 р. о 11:00 Evgeniy L <e...@mirantis.com> написав(ла):
> 
> >> I’d say even if it will be a separate service it’s better to proxy 
> >> requests through Nailgun’s API to have a single entry point.
> 
> I don't think that application such as Nailgun should be responsible for 
> proxying
> requests, we solved similar problem for OSTF with adding proxy rule in Nginx.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Roman Prykhodchenko <m...@romcheg.me 
> <mailto:m...@romcheg.me>> wrote:
> I’d say even if it will be a separate service it’s better to proxy requests 
> through Nailgun’s API to have a single entry point.
> 
>> 9 жовт. 2015 р. о 10:23 Evgeniy L <e...@mirantis.com 
>> <mailto:e...@mirantis.com>> написав(ла):
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> +1, but I think it's better to spawn separate service, instead of adding it 
>> to Nailgun.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 1:40 AM, Roman Prykhodchenko <m...@romcheg.me 
>> <mailto:m...@romcheg.me>> wrote:
>> Folks,
>> 
>> it’s time to speak about Fuel Plugins and the way they are managed.
>> 
>> Currently we have some methods in Fuel Client that allow to install, remove 
>> and do some other things to plugins. Everything looks great except that 
>> functionality requires Fuel Client to be installed on a master node and be 
>> running under a root user. It’s time for us to grow up and realize that 
>> nothing can require Fuel Client to be installed on a specific computer and 
>> of course we cannot require root permissions for any actions.
>> 
>> I’d like to move all that code to Nailgun, utilizing mules and hide it 
>> behind Nailgun’s API as soon as possible. For that I filed a bug [1] and I’d 
>> like to ask Fuel Enhancements subgroup of developers to take a close look at 
>> it.
>> 
>> 
>> 1. https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1504338 
>> <https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1504338>
>> 
>> 
>> - romcheg
>> 
>> 
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe 
>> <http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev 
>> <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
>> 
>> 
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org 
>> <mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org>?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev 
>> <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe 
> <http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev 
> <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to