Thanks Egor, I will update.




On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 2:15 AM, Egor Guz <e...@walmartlabs.com> wrote:

> thx, for clarification. do you mind to add this information to bp?
>
> I think we can get similar states through docker info against swarm, but
> not sure about mesos. could you check?
>
> —
> Egor
>
> From: Vikas Choudhary <choudharyvika...@gmail.com<mailto:
> choudharyvika...@gmail.com>>
> Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 at 16:04
> To: Walmart Associate <e...@walmartlabs.com<mailto:e...@walmartlabs.com>>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Coe components status
>
> @Egor,
>
> Kubectl commnad is "kubectl get cs"
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:09 PM, Egor Guz <e...@walmartlabs.com<mailto:
> e...@walmartlabs.com>> wrote:
> Vikas,
>
> Could you clarify what do you mean under ’status’? I don’t seed this
> command in kubectl, so I assume it is get or describe?
> Also for Docker, is it info, inspect or stats? We can get app/container
> details through Marathon API in Mesos, but it’s very depend what
> information we are looking for ;)
>
> My two cents, I think we should implement/found common ground between 'kub
> describe’, ‘docker inspect’ and 'curl http://${MASTER_IP}:8080/v2/tasks'
> first. These commands
> are very useful for troubleshooting.
>
> About 'magnum container’ command for all COEs, we should definitely
> discuss this topic during summit. But challenge here that Marathon/Mesos
> app/container definition is
> very different form Kub model.
>
> —
> Egor
>
> From: Vikas Choudhary <choudharyvika...@gmail.com<mailto:
> choudharyvika...@gmail.com><mailto:choudharyvika...@gmail.com<mailto:
> choudharyvika...@gmail.com>>>
> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> ><mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>>
> Date: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 at 20:56
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> ><mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Coe components status
>
> @ Eli ,
>
> I will look into how to support this feature for other COEs also(mesos and
> swarm). But anyways Magnum's goal is to provide users *atleast* what other
> coes are providing (if not something extra). All coes dont have common
> features, so we cant be very strict on providing common interface apis for
> all coes. For example "magnum container" commands work only with swarm not
> k8s or mesos.
> It will not be justified if k8s is providing a way to monitor at more
> granular level but magnum will not allow user to use it just beacuse other
> coes does not provide this feature.
>
> Agree that it will be nice if could support this feature for all. I will
> prefer to start with k8s first and if similar feature is supported by mesos
> and swarm also, incrementally will implement that also.
>
> Regards
> Vikas Choudhary
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 6:50 AM, Qiao,Liyong <liyong.q...@intel.com
> <mailto:liyong.q...@intel.com><mailto:liyong.q...@intel.com<mailto:
> liyong.q...@intel.com>>> wrote:
> hi Vikas,
> thanks for propose this changes, I wonder if you can show some examples
> for other coes we currently supported:
> swarm, mesos ?
>
> if we propose a public api like you proposed, we'd better to support all
> coes instead of coe specific.
>
> thanks
> Eli.
>
>
> On 2015年10月20日 18:14, Vikas Choudhary wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I would appreciate any opinion/concern regarding "coe-component-status"
> feature implementation [1].
>
> For example in k8s, using API
> api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/componentstatuses, status of each k8s
> component can be queried. My approach would be to provide a command in
> magnum like "magnum coe-component-status" leveraging coe provided rest api
> and result will be shown to user.
>
> [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/magnum/+spec/coe-component-status
>
>
>
> -Vikas Choudhary
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> <http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> ><mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org<mailto:
> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org>?subject:unsubscribe>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
> --
> BR, Eli(Li Yong)Qiao
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> <http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe><
> http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
>
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to