----- Original Message ----- > From: "Lennart Regebro" <lrege...@redhat.com> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Sent: Tuesday, 10 November, 2015 1:42:52 PM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] Let's stop hijacking other > projects' OSC namespaces > > These changes are fine to me. > > I'm not so sure about the idea that we can't "hijack" other projects > namespaces. If only ironic is allowed to use the prefix "baremetal", > then the prefix should not have been "baremetal" in the first place, > it should have been "ironic". Which of course means it would just be a > replacement for the ironic client, making these whole namespaces > pointless.
I thought the point of the new namespaces was to reduce cognitive load on users - "what's the command for doing things with baremetal nodes, again? Some pun on metals and 90s pop music - metallica? goldie? lithium? ironmaiden?" Miles __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
