On 11 November 2015 at 13:58, Kyle Mestery <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Armando M. <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi neutronians, >> >> Whilst I recover from the gate failure binge eating...I wanted to put out >> there a couple of process changes that should help the drivers team and the >> PTL to improve their ability to justify priority assignments for new >> features. >> >> Comments welcome. >> >> > I commented in the review, but I thought I'd reply here as well. I don't > understand the reason to move to only using "High" and "Low" priority, it > seems somewhat arbitrary. Of course, you could argue our current system for > prioritizing is arbitrary as well, but I'd argue that utilizing all 4 > priorities makes sense. Ultimately though, this is all mostly arbitrary > anyways, and we all likely understand the stuff which is important (e.g. > Essential). We have done a bad job at getting that stuff into a release in > the past though. > Thanks Kyle, I'll elaborate more on the patch. > > And now I feel like Salvatore and I'll stop pedantically meandering. > > >> Cheers, >> Armando >> >> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/244302/ >> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/244313/ >> >> __________________________________________________________________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: >> [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
