Please note that should be #openstack-sdks (plural) ! > On Nov 13, 2015, at 6:58 AM, Sean Dague <[email protected]> wrote: > > The #openstack-api IRC channel is quite quiet most days. As such it's > not something that people are regularly checking in on, or often forget > about (I know I've been guilty of that). Plus we don't always have the > right people in a conversation to make a decision. > > I'd like to propose we drop the channel entirely and make #openstack-sdk > the home of API working group conversations. That's where all the > openstackclient, openstackclientconfig, and sdk conversations are > happening. It's where the end consumers of any API WG effort are, so are > incredibly good sounding boards for things we are doing. There is > already a large overlap between the two channels, so just pushing > forward on that means more critical mass for conversations around the > whole space of a more usable API for users. > > This came up at the last API WG meeting, but those are pretty low quorum > events, so this is a thing we should definitely decide over ML instead. > > Please express your feelings here and lets make it happen. :)
A little bit of data to inform the decision. I threw together a quick n' dirty spreadsheet [1] to see what the user overlap is like. 16 of the 39 in #openstack-api are already in #openstack-sdks. I'm actually not super opinionated on it. But I suppose I'd lean towards folding it in. Would like to hear what others in the API WG think. Everett [1] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/12i1bSIu38yLXnAiasNjb4Nzhy1yaHmVOQ3kFr1GIFIk/edit?usp=sharing __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
