I have updated the etherpad to add "Overall requirement - API cross check among the features that can manipulate the same flow's forwarding behavior".
Thanks, Cathy -----Original Message----- From: Paul Carver [mailto:pcar...@paulcarver.us] Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 7:50 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc] How could an L2 agent extension access agent methods ? On 11/13/2015 7:03 PM, Henry Fourie wrote: > > I wonder whether just pushing flows into the existing tables at random > points in time can be unstable and break the usual flow assumed by the main > agent loop. > LF> No not expect any issues. > > Am I making sense? > > [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/l2-agent-extensions-api-expansion > I attempted to describe a possible issue at the bottom of the Etherpad in the bullet point "Overall requirement - Flow prioritization mechanism" __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev