On 7 December 2015 at 05:41, Ryan Moats <rmo...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > "Armando M." <arma...@gmail.com> wrote on 12/04/2015 03:43:29 PM: > > > From: "Armando M." <arma...@gmail.com> > > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > Date: 12/04/2015 03:44 PM > > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][DVR] > > > > > On 4 December 2015 at 05:56, Ryan Moats <rmo...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > I pretty much agree with Oleg here - I'm not sure an additional tag > > > for defects is needed. > > > The idea of a DvrImpact in the commit message is interesting, but > > > I'm not entirely convinced - if we > > > do it for one sub-project, do we need to do it for all sub-projects > > > and then what does that turn into? > > What does this mean? No other project should care about this. DVR is > > a core feature. > > I'm trying to understand if (at its logical conclusion) we end up with > commit tags for all features (i.e. RbacImpact, BareMetalImpact, DbImpact, > etc.) and what that would do to the commit message... >
Oh, you mean feature! Well, even if we did have one per feature, we wouldn't have a single patch impacting multiple features; patches are meant to be small and cohesive in nature, and if they impacted more than one area they should be broken down. > > > Ryan Moats (regXboi) > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
