I also vote for baremetal-inspection - punning names are fun, but increase the 
amount of stuff new developers have to learn.

I'm totally in for the Peter Sellers marathon, though.

Miles

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jay Pipes" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Saturday, 5 December, 2015 2:53:17 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] [ironic] Picking an official name for 
> a subproject (ironic-inspector in this
> case)
> 
> On 12/04/2015 04:45 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> > 1. "baremetal<SEPARATOR>introspection" - named after the process we
> > implement
> > 2. "baremetal<SEPARATOR>inspector" - using our code name after the
> > official ironic project name.
> 
> baremetal-inspection is my vote.
> 
> I believe Pavlo will soon be proposing a hardware-composition service
> endpoint as well...
> 
> Best,
> -jay
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to