On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 09:03:10AM EST, Mike Spreitzer wrote: > Lots cheers from me too. Let me add one thing: "the spec is not > maintained" is a remaining process bug. A spec by itself is a very useful > thing. It is the first thing to read when trying to understand the > implementation. How about we resolve that devref includes a maintained > version of the spec?
Mike brings up a good point. The one issue we need to content with is Google rankings. Specs are published at specs.openstack.org - and are going to be found by people looking to know more about an API. Especially when api-site and networking API doc needs improvement. Specs are a good starting point, but my hope would be that perhaps we go back through the specs and add a note at the top pointing to the maintained API documentation - once the feature has landed. -- Sean M. Collins __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
