Hi, Sridhar,

Great to know that Tacker also begins to address multi-VIM ( multi-OpenStack ) 
requirement in OPNFV cloud, and your concerns on OPNFV multisite and OpenStack 
Tricircle project.

I just gave some comment on the spec. And I think the most important one for 
Tacker integration with Tricircle is the VNF placement policy, it would be 
great to use region_id( in OpenStack, region is identified with region_name) + 
Availability Zone for VNF placement.
Such a placement policy will work in every scenario: Tacker + multi-region 
OpenStack, Tacker+Amazon, Tacker +Tricircle (+multi OpenStack), Tacker + 
multi-region OpenStack +Tricircle (+multi OpenStack).  For Tricircle will 
integrate multi-OpenStack into one region, and each bottom OpenStack will work 
like one availability zone, Tacker can treat Tricircle as one OpenStack region.

It’s quite important for VNFs(the telecom application) to be deployed into 
multiple availability zones to achieve five 9 carrier grade reliability over 
the four 9 reliability of OpenStack.

Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang )

From: Sridhar Ramaswamy [mailto:sric...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 10:25 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: caizhiyuan (A)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Tacker][Tricircle]Multi-VIM collaboration

Sure.

As mentioned in the BP we stumbled into Tricycle project while researching for 
this feature (and hence got mentioned in the BP). It sure looks promising. The 
immediate asks from our user community is quite modest though, so we are trying 
to keep the scope small. However the integration point you mention make sense, 
so that Tacker + Tricircle could be one of the deployment option. Lets continue 
the discussion in the gerrit as we put all other suggestions coming in (like 
heat multi-cloud / multi-region) in perspective. It will be great to get the 
Tacker multi-site API bake in different multi-site deployment patterns 
underneath.

- Sridhar

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:37 PM, Zhipeng Huang 
<zhipengh...@gmail.com<mailto:zhipengh...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Tacker team,

As I commented in the BP[1], our team is interested in a collaboration in this 
area. I think one of the collaboration point would be to define a mapping 
between tacker multi-vim api with Tricircle resource routing api table [2].

[1]https://review.openstack.org/#/c/249085/
[2]https://docs.google.com/document/d/18kZZ1snMOCD9IQvUKI5NVDzSASpw-QKj7l2zNqMEd3g/edit#heading=h.5t71ara040n5

--
Zhipeng (Howard) Huang

Standard Engineer
IT Standard & Patent/IT Prooduct Line
Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd
Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com<mailto:huangzhip...@huawei.com>
Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen

(Previous)
Research Assistant
Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2
University of California, Irvine
Email: zhipe...@uci.edu<mailto:zhipe...@uci.edu>
Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402

OpenStack, OPNFV, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute Aficionado

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: 
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to