Hi, I am sure oslo.policy would be good under Keystone's governance. But I am not sure I understood what's wrong in having oslo.policy under the oslo program ?
Jordan On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Brant Knudson <b...@acm.org> wrote: > > I'd like to propose moving oslo.policy from the oslo program to the > keystone program. Keystone developers know what's going on with oslo.policy > and I think are more interested in what's going on with it so that reviews > will get proper vetting, and it's not like oslo doesn't have enough going > on with all the other repos. Keystone core has equivalent stringent > development policy that we already enforce with keystoneclient and > keystoneauth, so oslo.policy isn't going to be losing any stability. > > If there aren't any objections, let's go ahead with this. I heard this > requires a change to a governance repo, and gerrit permission changes to > make keystone-core core, and updates in oslo.policy to change some docs or > links. Any oslo.policy specs that are currently proposed > > - Brant > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
