Regarding the list of attendees and their schedule constraints, it seems that: 25-26-27 of January would work for everyone.
Please let me know if that's not the case. On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Emilien Macchi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 11/24/2015 05:41 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > Hello, > > > > If you're involved in Puppet OpenStack or if you want to be involved, > > please look at this poll: http://goo.gl/forms/lsBf55Ru8L > > > > Thanks a lot for your time, > > So we got 18 people interested by participating to a Puppet midcycle. > The output was: > * People are interested by a midcycle > * People don't want to do a second physical midcycle (after OPS) > * Some people can't go at OPS midcycle and can only attend virtual > midcycle. > > I think we should let a chance to anyone to participate and I don't > believe a physical + virtual midcycle would work. > So I propose to organize a virtual midcycle in January. > > Please look at the etherpad [1], write your name if you want to > participate and your schedule constraints so we can find the best slot > for everyone. > > Also feel free to propose topics. > > Looking forward to see you there, > > [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-happy-new-year-2016 > -- > Emilien Macchi > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -- Emilien Macchi
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
