On 01/05/2016 11:07 PM, Lana Brindley wrote: > >> On 6 Jan 2016, at 1:19 PM, Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> wrote: >> >> On 2016-01-06 11:43:34 +1100 (+1100), Lana Brindley wrote: >> [...] >>> I’m starting to think that DocImpact needs to simply be retired then >> >> Alternatively, let the remaining projects which currently auto-open >> bugs for openstack-manuals switch to opening bugs against themselves >> and allow their bug triagers to redirect them to the docs team once >> the requisite details are determined. And then if those projects >> don't want to do the work of enforcing or researching the reasons >> for docimpact headers in individual changes, they can decide to stop >> supporting them on a project-by-project basis. > > Well, we’ve already done that for big tent projects. The new job was the > solution for the ‘defcore’ projects, which we were guinea-pigging in Nova > before rolling it out to the others. But if Nova rejects it, I think that > maybe we’re dead in the water.
I think auto openning against a project, and shuffling it to manuals manually (with details added by humans) would be fine. It's not clear to me why a new job was required for that. -Sean -- Sean Dague http://dague.net __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev