On 22 January 2016 at 10:08, Markus Zoeller <mzoel...@de.ibm.com> wrote: > The dates and times are final now [1]. They differ from the previously > dates in this thread! The first and next meetings will be: > > Tuesday 2016-02-09 18:00 UTC #openstack-meeting-4 > Tuesday 2016-02-23 18:00 UTC #openstack-meeting-4 > Tuesday 2016-03-01 10:00 UTC #openstack-meeting-4 > > I have to cancel the meeting of 2016-02-16 in advance, as I have a > medical appointment a day before which will knock me out for the week. > > The dates make it possible to attend either the "nova-bugs-team" > or the "nova-team" of the same week as they take turns in "early" > and "late" time of day. > > The agenda can be found in the wiki [2]. > > See you there! > > References: > [1] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Nova_Bugs_Team_Meeting > [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova/BugsTeam > > Regard, Markus Zoeller (markus_z)
A big thank you for pushing on this. As we head into Mitaka-3, post non-priority feature freeze, its a great time to push on reviewing bug fixes, and fixing important bugs. Thanks, johnthetubaguy > > Markus Zoeller/Germany/IBM@IBMDE wrote on 01/20/2016 05:14:14 PM: > >> From: Markus Zoeller/Germany/IBM@IBMDE >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List \(not for usage questions\)" >> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> >> Date: 01/20/2016 05:27 PM >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] nova-bugs-team IRC meeting >> >> Due to other meetings which merged since the announcement, >> the IRC meeting patch [1] I pushed proposes now: >> Tuesday 1000 UTC #openstack-meeting beweekly-odd >> Tuesday 1700 UTC #openstack-meeting beweekly-even >> >> February the 9th at 1000 UTC will be the first kickoff meeting. >> I'll have an agenda ready until then [2]. Feel free to ping me in IRC >> or here on the ML when you have questions. >> >> References: >> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/270281/ >> [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova/BugsTeam >> >> Regards, Markus Zoeller (markus_z) >> >> >> Markus Zoeller/Germany/IBM@IBMDE wrote on 01/13/2016 01:24:06 PM: >> > From: Markus Zoeller/Germany/IBM@IBMDE >> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List" >> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> >> > Date: 01/13/2016 01:25 PM >> > Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] nova-bugs-team IRC meeting >> > >> > Hey folks, >> > >> > I'd like to revive the nova-bugs-team IRC meeting. As I want to chair >> > those meetings in my "bug czar" role, the timeslots are bound to my >> > timezone (UTC+1). The two bi-weekly alternating slots I have in mind >> > are: >> > * Tuesdays, 10:00 UTC biweekly-odd (to get folks to the east of me) >> > * Tuesdays, 16:00 UTC biweekly-even (to get folks to the west of me) >> > By choosing these slots, the concluded action items of this meeting > can >> > be finished until the next nova meeting of the same week on Thursday. >> > The "early" and "late" timeslot is diametrical to the slots of the > nova >> > meeting to allow you to attend one of those meetings for your > timezone. >> > >> > Day odd week even week >> > ----------------- -------- --------- --------- >> > nova meeting Thursday 21:00 UTC 14:00 UTC >> > nova bugs meeting Tuesday 10:00 UTC 16:00 UTC >> > >> > Let me know if you think these slots are not reasonable. My goal is >> > to have the first kick-off meeting at the 9th of February at 10:00 > UTC. >> > >> > The scope of the team meeting: >> > * discuss and set the report-priority of bugs since the last meeting >> > if not yet done. >> > * decide action items for bug reports which need further attention >> > * expire bugs which are hit by the expiration-policy unless someone >> > disagrees. >> > * get one or more volunteers for the rotating bug-skimming-duty. >> > Get feedback from the volunteers from the previous week if there >> > are noteworthy items. >> > * check if new problem areas are emerging >> > * discuss process adjustments/changes if necessary >> > * spreading knowledge and discuss open points >> > >> > Review [1] contains my (WIP) proposal of the process I have in mind. >> > This still needs concensus, but this is not the focus in this post. >> > The first meeting(s) can be used as a kick-off to discuss items in >> > that proposal. >> > >> > References: >> > [1] Nova docs: "Bug Process": https://review.openstack.org/#/c/266453 >> > >> > Regards, Markus Zoeller (markus_z) >> > >> > >> > >> > __________________________________________________________________________ >> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> > Unsubscribe: >> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > >> >> >> >> > __________________________________________________________________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev