On Thu, Jan 28 2016, Foley, Emma L wrote: > So, metrics are grouped by the type of resource they use, and each metric has > to be listed. > Grouping isn't a problem, but creating an exhaustive list might be, since > there > are 100+ plugins [1] in collectd which can provide statistics, although not > all > of these are useful, and some require extensive configuration. The plugins > each > provide multiple metrics, and each metric can be duplicated for a number of > instances, examples: [2]. > > Collectd data is minimal: timestamp and volume, so there's little room to > find interesting meta data. > It would be nice to see this support integrated, but it might be very tedious > to list all the metric names and group by resource type without any form of > Do the resource definitions support wildcards? Collectd can provide A LOT of > metrics.
One also has to put into balance the upside of going through Ceilometer, as Gnocchi has direct support for statsd: http://gnocchi.xyz/statsd.html -- Julien Danjou # Free Software hacker # https://julien.danjou.info
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
