+1 from me On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Jay Pipes <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 02/10/2016 07:33 AM, Sean Dague wrote: >> >> The largeops tests at this point are mostly finding out that some of our >> new cloud providers are slow - http://tinyurl.com/j5u4nf5 >> >> This is fundamentally a performance test, with timings having been tuned >> to pass 98% of the time on two clouds that were very predictable in >> performance. We're now running on 4 clouds, and the variance between >> them all, and between every run on each can be as much as a factor of 2. >> >> We could just bump all the timeouts again, but that's basically the same >> thing as dropping them. >> >> These tests are not instrumented in a way that any real solution can be >> addressed in most cases. Tests without a path forward, that are failing >> good patches a lot, are very much the kind of thing we should remove >> from the system. > > > +1 from me. > > -jay > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-- Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev