On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Armando M. <arma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11 February 2016 at 07:01, John Belamaric <jbelama...@infoblox.com>
> wrote:
>> It is only internal implementation changes.
>
> That's not entirely true, is it? There are config variables to change and it
> opens up the possibility of a scenario that the operator may not care about.

You're right.  I was thinking that if we handled the switch then we
could obsolete the config variable.  Maybe we shot ourselves in the
foot already by having the config option in the first place.  Is that
what you're thinking?

Carl

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to