Hi Dmitry, The thing is it may not require changes in Fuel for 10.0 too, ideally we would like to add a couple of new gates to OpenStack infra, so they will be enabled for external extensions when there are any.
Thanks, On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Dmitry Borodaenko <dborodae...@mirantis.com > wrote: > If the spec is not going to require code changes in 9.0/Mitaka, why not > simply target it for 10.0/Newton? > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 05:21:55PM +0300, Evgeniy L wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We have a spec where we are trying to do research and describe how we are > > going to test extensions [0], we will not be able to land it before > feature > > freeze, so should we get feature freeze exception for it? Or it will not > be > > a problem to merge it even after FF? > > > > The spec itself is more about the process which we are going to follow > > during extensions development, so there should be no changes for current > > projects. > > > > Thanks, > > > > [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/281749/ > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Unsubscribe: > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev