On 4 March 2016 at 16:50, Major Hayden <ma...@mhtx.net> wrote: > Hey folks, > > I have proposed a review[1] which adds the openstack-ansible-security[2] > role to OpenStack-Ansible's Liberty release. I would really appreciate > some feedback from deployers on whether this change is desirable in Liberty. > > The role applies cleanly to Liberty on Ubuntu 14.04 and the role already > has some fairly basic gating. > > The two main questions are: > > 1) Does it make sense to backport the openstack-ansible-security > role/playbook to Liberty? > 2) Should it be applied by default on AIO/gate builds as it is > in Mitaka (master)? > > Thanks! > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/273257/ > [2] http://docs.openstack.org/developer/openstack-ansible-security/
Hi Major, Liberty is a stable branch and the Mitaka release is just around the corner. I think it's a bit late in the game to add it. Consider, also, that deployers can easily consume the role with their own playbook to execute it if they would like to. *If* a backport is supported by the consuming community and core team, I would only support an opt-in model to allow deployers to make use of the role, but only if they choose to.
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
