On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Derek Higgins <der...@redhat.com> wrote: > We discussed this at today's meeting but never really came to a > conclusion except to say most people wanted to try it. The main > objection brought up was that we shouldn't go dropping the nonha job, > that isn't what I was proposing so let me rephrase here and see if we > can gather +/-1's > > I'm proposing we redeploy our testenvs with more RAM allocated per > env, specifically we would go from > 5G undercloud and 4G overcloud nodes to > 6G undercloud and 5G overcloud nodes to
+1 > > In addition to accommodate this we would reduce the number of env's > available from 48 (the actually number varies from time to time) to 36 > (3 envs per host) > > No changes would be happening on the jobs we actually run +1 > > The assumption is that with the increased resources we would hit less > false negative test results and as a result recheck jobs less (so the > 25% reduction in capacity wouldn't hit us as hard as it might seem), > we also may not be able to easily undo this if it doesn't work out as > once we start merging things that use the extra RAM it will be hard to > go back. The CPU load is also very high. When I have been looking at jobs that appear stuck, it takes almost 3 minutes just to do a nova list sometimes. So I think 1 less testenv on each host will help that as well. -- -- James Slagle -- __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
