+1 for me, Gnocchi is bringing great features to improve Ceilometer deployments at scale. It would be a first iteration and brings interesting feedback by having it. Go for it!
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Pradeep Kilambi <p...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Everyone: > > As Mitaka branch was cut yesterday, I would like to request a backport > exception to get gnocchi patches[1][2][3] into stable/mitaka. It > should low risk feature as we decided not to set ceilometer to use > gnocchi by default. So ceilometer would work as is and gnocchi is > deployed along side as a new service but not used out of the box. So > this should make upgrades pretty much a non issues as things should > work exactly like before. If someone want to use gnocchi backend, they > can add an env template file to override the backend. In Netwon, we'll > flip the switch to make gnocchi the default backend. > > If we can please vote to agree to get this in as an exception it would > be super useful. > > Thanks, > ~ Prad > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/252032/ > [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/290710/ > [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/238013/ > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Emilien Macchi __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev