On 2016-04-04 20:06:03 -0400 (-0400), Jay Pipes wrote: > I'm really not sure why you are being so hostile to my proposal. > Essentially, I wanted to involve the upstream Infra team in this > so they can advise on the project and ensure that the 3rd party CI > system that gets built matches what is used for the upstream > system. > > I'm not trying to add load to the infra team. Quite the opposite, > I am attempting to gain a level of coordination to ensure an > aligned CI system is produced that won't be a giant pain for all > involved.
I didn't intend to come across as hostile. My concern was over what sounded like a proposal for the OpenStack Foundation to hire some systems administrators for the purpose of running a CI environment to test hardware-specific features within the scope of the Infra team. Your original suggestion[*] said things like "OpenStack Foundation [with help] hire 2 or more systems administrators to maintain this lab environment" and "upstream Infrastructure team works with the hired system administrators to create a single CI system". If the actual proposal is for member companies to set up a CI system using the documentation and support our community already collectively provides to that end, I welcome their participation in and contributions to the existing third-party CI ecosystem. If the proposal is for integrating a hardware test environment into the upstream CI directly, having the Infra team responsible for its care and feeding and getting the OpenStack Foundation to dedicate staff to that end, then my concerns stand as stated. [*] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-March/090513.html -- Jeremy Stanley __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
