It still was more common then not I think? So making it less common is probably a step on the wrong direction.
Thanks, Kevin ________________________________________ From: Daniel P. Berrange [berra...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 9:36 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FYI: Removing default flavors from nova On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 04:29:00PM +0000, Fox, Kevin M wrote: > It feels kind of like a defcore issue though. Its harder for app > developers to create stuff like heat templates intended for cross > cloud that recommend a size, m1.small, without a common reference. Even with Nova defining these default flavours, it didn't do anything to help solve this problem as all the public cloud operators were just deleting these flavours & creating their own. So it just gave people a false sense of standardization where none actually existed. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
