Xianshan <xi...@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
Hi, Duncan & michael,
Thanks a lot for your replies.
Definitely I agree with you that the microversion is the best approach to
solve the backwards compat,
and the neutron is also going to adopt it [1]. But it will take a long
time to totally introduce it into neutron I think.
So IMO, we can continue this discussion and then implement this feature
in parallel with the microversion.
Actually, according to the design [2], only a slight change will be done
once the microversion landed, i.e.
replace the ' new header ' with the microversion to control the final
format about the error message in the wsgi interface.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/136760/
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/298704
If no one is going to help with microversioning, it won’t ever happen. I
suggest we consolidate whichever resources we have to get it done, instead
of working on small API iterations as proposed in the thread.
Ihar
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
