Excerpts from Douglas Mendizábal's message of 2016-04-13 10:01:21 -0700: > Hash: SHA512 > > Hi Reza, > > The Barbican team has already abstracted python-barbicanclient into a > general purpose key-storage library called Castellan [1] > > There are a few OpenStack projects that have planned to integrate or > are currently integrating with Castellan to avoid a hard dependency on > Barbican. > > There are some tradeoffs to choosing Castellan over > python-barbicanclient and Castellan may not be right for everyone. > Also, the only complete implementation of Castellan is currently the > Barbican implementation, so even though integrating with Castellan > does not result in a direct dependency, there is still work to be done > to have a working non-barbican solution.
From an outsider's perspective with no real stake in this debate, this sounds like a very reasonable way for Magnum to proceed, which a pre-dependency that they would move their file based approach into Castellan. __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
