The thread I'm referring to in the prev message is: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/2014-January/000624.html
-- Best regards, Oleg Gelbukh Mirantis Inc. On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Oleg Gelbukh <ogelb...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm sorry for replying to this old thread, but I would really like to see > this moving. > > There's a 'pre-release' pipeline in Zuul which serves exactly that > purpose: handle pre-release tags (beta-versions). However, per this thread, > it is not recommended due to possible issues with pip unable to > differentiate pre-release versions from main releases. > > Another option here is to publish minor versions of the package, i.e. > start with 9.0.0 early, and then increase to 9.0.1 etc once the development > progresses. > > -- > Best regards, > Oleg Gelbukh > Mirantis Inc. > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Yuriy Taraday <yorik....@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> By the way, it would be very helpful for testing external tools if we had >> 7.0.1 release on PyPI as well. It seems python-fuelclient somehow ended up >> with a "stable/7.0.1" branch instead of "7.0.1" tag. >> >> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:49 PM Roman Prykhodchenko <m...@romcheg.me> >> wrote: >> >>> Releasing a beta version sounds like a good plan but does OpenStack >>> Infra actually support this? >>> >>> > 20 січ. 2016 р. о 12:05 Oleg Gelbukh <ogelb...@mirantis.com> >>> написав(ла): >>> > >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > Currently we're experiencing issues with Python dependencies of our >>> package (fuel-octane), specifically between fuelclient's dependencies and >>> keystoneclient dependencies. >>> > >>> > New keystoneclient is required to work with the new version of Nailgun >>> due to introduction of SSL in the latter. On the other hand, fuelclient is >>> released along with the main release of Fuel, and the latest version >>> available from PyPI is 7.0.0, and it has very old dependencies (based on >>> packages available in centos6/python26). >>> > >>> > The solution I'd like to propose is to release beta version of >>> fuelclient (8.0.0b1) with updated requirements ASAP. With --pre flag to >>> pip/tox, this will allow to run unittests against the proper set of >>> requirements. On the other hand, it will not break the users consuming the >>> latest stable (7.0.0) version with old requirements from PyPI. >>> > >>> > Please, share your thoughts and considerations. If no objections, I >>> will create a corresponding bug/blueprint against fuelclient to be fixed in >>> the current release cycle. >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Best regards, >>> > Oleg Gelbukh >>> > Mirantis >>> > >>> > >>> __________________________________________________________________________ >>> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>> > Unsubscribe: >>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>> >>> >>> __________________________________________________________________________ >>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>> Unsubscribe: >>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>> >> >> __________________________________________________________________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: >> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev