> From: Dean Troyer <dtro...@gmail.com> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Date: 04/14/2016 08:18 PM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [devstack] Adding example > "local.conf" files for testing? > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Markus Zoeller <mzoel...@de.ibm.com> wrote: > Let me know what you think: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/305967/ > > My only real concern is you've implied a structure that will > potentially have many combinations of configurations and those will > bitrot. How different are x86 and s390 arch in local.conf? (I've > never seen an s390 local.conf!) I do know there are few, if any, > differences between most ubuntu and fedora configs, we abstract most > of that out in the scripts. > > I wonder if the grouping of configs might be better suited along usa- > case lines? nova-net vs neutron, single- vs multi-node, etc. > > Thanks for getting this started! > dt > > -- > > Dean Troyer > dtro...@gmail.com
The main difference between x86 and s390x (system z) is that s390x doesn't support nova-network and VNC|RDP|SPICE. Which means s390x depends on Neutron and the "serial console". The rest should work like on x86. I guess having an IF-ELSE block in a "local.conf" is crazy talk? Regards, Markus Zoeller (markus_z) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev