On 4/12/16, 10:42 AM, "Jeremy Stanley" <fu...@yuggoth.org> wrote:
>On 2016-04-02 14:40:57 +0000 (+0000), Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: >[...] >> IANAL and writing these things correctly is hard to do properly ); >> involving the community around the pain points of the tagging >> process is what I'm after. >[...] > >Nobody on the VMT is a lawyer either, and when I wrote the original >text I wanted to make sure it provided sufficient guidance on our >expectations while still being inclusive and without needing a >lawyer to interpret. As it stands, the VMT and TC still make the >final call on whether an application is sufficiently convincing, so >the point of the application criteria are to make sure projects know >what sort of convincing we're looking for. >-- >Jeremy Stanley Agree - I recognize after trying my hand at writing just one part of the complete VMT tag how difficult it is. I think you did a great job on the initial work. It appears like we are both after the same outcome. I think the changes in my review to section 5 are a good start, but with the cross project session I proposed on scaling the OSSA/VMT, my proposal may need to change as a result of the outcome of that cross project session. Regards -steve > __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
