On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 6:16 AM, Steven Hardy <[email protected]> wrote: > All, > > We discussed some changes to our release cycle in the weekly meeting > yesterday, namely to align with the intended direction of the puppet > community to adopt the new cycle-trailing tag[1]. > > We have also discussed and agreed[2] to adopt the standard stable branch > policy[3] for those repos where we maintain stable/mitaka branches (from > mitaka onwards, superseding the "release branch" experimient we tried > for stable/liberty)[4]. > > To reflect these changes via the governance repo, I've proposed a patch[5] > that changes the tags to release:cycle-trailing and stable:follows-policy > for those repos where it is appropriate. > > Please provide feedback on that review if you have any comments, questions > or concerns about this, thanks! > > Steve
Thanks, I also pushed a followup patch to move the other projects from release:independent to release:cycle-with-intermediary. However, I left diskimage-builder and dib-utils as release:independent for now pending the discussion in the dib thread. https://review.openstack.org/308574 -- -- James Slagle -- __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
