On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 03:16:56PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 4/29/2016 10:28 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:13:42AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > >>We've just landed the libvirt min to bump us up to 1.2.1 required. It's > >>probably a good time consider the appropriate bump for Otaca. > >> > >>By that time our Ubuntu LTS will be 16.04 (libvirt 1.3.1), RHEL 7.1 > >>(1.2.8). Additionally Debian Jessie has 1.2.9. RHEL 7.2 is at 1.2.17. > > > >By the time Ocata is released, I think it'll be valid to ignore > >RHEL-7.1, as we'll already be onto 7.3 at that time. > > > >>My suggestion is we set MIN_LIBVIRT_VERSION to 1.2.8. This will mean > >>that NUMA support in libvirt (excepting the blacklists) and huge page > >>support is assumed on x86_64. > > > >If we ignore RHEL 7.1, we could go to 1.2.9 which is the min in Jessie. > > Is there a simple reason why ignoring RHEL 7.1 is OK? Honestly I can't > remember which OpenStack release came out around that time, was it Kilo?
By the time Ocata comes out, we'll be on RHEL-7.3 as latest update so people really shouldn't be continuing to deploy on RHEL-7.1. IOW, I think we should be aiming to target $current & $current-1 RHEL-7 update releases. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev