On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Chris Dent <cdent...@anticdent.org> wrote:
> Since then the spec has been updated to reflect using OSC but the > question of whether this is in fact the right place for this style > of commands remains open. Not just for this situation, but > generally. > This came up again last week, and there is still no real consensus as to whether admin-only stuff should be included in the repo or kept in plugins. The things already in the OSC repo are likely to stay for the forseeable future, new things could go either way. If you are planning a separate client/lib, it would make sense to do the OSC plugin as part of that lib. That is also a chance to get a really clean Python API that doesn't have the cruft of novaclient dt -- Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
