It appears that many of the existing specs repos contain a confusing
mixture of Apache 2.0 licensed code and Creative Commons licensed docs.
The official cookie-cutter for creating new specs repos [1] appears to
also contain a mixture of the two licenses, although it's even more
confusing because it seems an attempt was made to change the license
from Apache to Creative Commons [2] yet there are still several [3]
places [4] where Apache is clearly specified.
I personally have no opinion on what license should be used, but I'd
like to clearly specify the license for the newly-created manila-specs
repo, and I'm happy with whatever the TC is currently recommending.
-Ben Swartzlander
[1] https://github.com/openstack-dev/specs-cookiecutter
[2]
https://github.com/openstack-dev/specs-cookiecutter/commit/8738f58981da3ad9c0f27fb545d61747213482a4#diff-053c5863d526dd5103cd9b0069074596
[3]
https://github.com/openstack-dev/specs-cookiecutter/blob/master/%7B%7Bcookiecutter.repo_name%7D%7D/setup.cfg#L12
[4]
https://github.com/openstack-dev/specs-cookiecutter/blob/master/README.rst
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
