Yipei, According to Chaoyi, you have a bunch of experiences regarding to the OpenStack, networking which is awesome.
I look forward to hearing from you soon. Cheers, Shinobu On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Yipei Niu <[email protected]> wrote: > Got it with thanks. > > Best regards, > Yipei > > On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 9:48 AM, joehuang <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi, Yipei, >> >> Shinobu is correct, this should be taken into consideration in the design >> of dynamic pod binding. >> >> How to schedule pod, you can refer to host-aggregate scheduling with >> flavor, the difference is that the scheduling granularity is on pod level. >> By the tag in flavor extra-spec and volume type extrac_spec , tricircle can >> be aware of which type of resource the tenant wants to provision. >> >> For example: >> https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_OpenStack_Platform/4/html/Configuration_Reference_Guide/host-aggregates.html >> >> So in >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/18kZZ1snMOCD9IQvUKI5NVDzSASpw-QKj7l2zNqMEd3g/edit, >> one field called resource_affinity_tag is proposed to be added into the pod >> table, it could be used for scheduling purpose. But this is only one >> proposal, you may have better idea to do that, after the spec is reviewed >> and approved, the doc can be update to reflect the new idea. >> >> Best Regards >> Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Shinobu Kinjo [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 8:06 AM >> To: Yipei Niu >> Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); >> joehuang; Zhiyuan Cai; 金城 忍 >> Subject: Re: [tricircle] About the dynamic pod binding >> >> Hi Yipei, >> >> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Yipei Niu <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi, all, >> > >> > For dynamic pod binding, I have some questions. >> > >> [snip] >> > 3. How is Tricircle aware of what type of resource wanted by tenants? >> > For example, a tenant wants to boot VMs for CAD modelling with >> > corresponding flavor. But in current code, the flavorRef is not get >> > involved in function get_pod_by_az_tenant, when querying pod bindings. >> > So do we need to modify the pod binding table to add such a column? >> >> Working through code bases, probably you are talking about future >> implementation, I guess. >> >> Cheers, >> Shinobu >> >> > >> > Best regards, >> > Yipei >> >> >> >> -- >> Email: >> [email protected] >> [email protected] > > -- Email: [email protected] [email protected] __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
