So it was under my belief that at its current stage that this library
would start off on its own, and not initially start of (just yet) in
oslo (as I think the oslo group wants to not be the blocker/requirement
for a library being a successful thing + the cost of it being in oslo
may not be warranted yet).
If in the future we as a community think it is better under oslo (and
said membership into oslo will help); then I'm ok with it being there...
I just know that others (in the oslo group) have other thoughts here
(and hopefully they can chime in).
Part of this is also being refined in
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/312233/ and that hopefully can be a
guideline for new libraries that come along.
-Josh
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Since the review [1] to create the repo is up now, I have one question:
This is a cross-project effort, so what is it's governance?
The review stated it will be an independent project outside of the big
tent - but seeing that this should become a common part for core
projects and specific to OpenStack, I wonder whether that is the right
approach. It fits nicely into Oslo as cross-project library - or it
could be an independent team on its own in the Big Tent.
But cross-project and outside of Big Tent looks very strange to me,
Andreas
[1] https://review.openstack.org/284454
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
