Hello, Team, >From last Monday to today, only single candidate (myself, if I missed >someone's nomination, please point out) for the PTL election of Tricircle for >Newton release, according to the guideline from the community, no election is >needed.
So I would like to serve as the PTL of Tricircle in Newton release, thanks for your support, let's move Tricircle forward together. Best Regards Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) -----Original Message----- From: joehuang Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 10:08 AM To: 'OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)' Subject: RE: [openstack-dev][tricircle]PTL election of Tricircle for Newton release Hi, team, If you want to be the PTL for Newton release of Tricircle, please send your self nomination letter in the mail-list this week. Best Regards Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) -----Original Message----- From: joehuang Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2016 9:44 AM To: 'ski...@redhat.com'; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev][tricircle]PTL election of Tricircle for Newton release Hello, As discussed in yesterday weekly meeting, PTL nomination period from May 9 ~ May 13, election from May 16 ~ May 20 if more than one nomination . If you want to be the PTL for Newton release of Tricircle, please send your self nomination letter in the mail-list. You can refer to the nomination letter of other projects, for example, Kuryr[1], Glance[2], Neutron[3], others can also be found in [4] [1]http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/election/plain//candidates/newton/Kuryr/Gal_Sagie.txt [2]http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/election/plain//candidates/newton/Glance/Nikhil_Komawar.txt [3]http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/election/plain//candidates/newton/Neutron/Armando_Migliaccio.txt [4]https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/PTL_Elections_March_2016 Best Regards Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) -----Original Message----- From: Shinobu Kinjo [mailto:shinobu...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 5:35 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Requirements for becoming approved official project Hi Team, There is an additional work to become an official (approval) project. Once we complete PTL election with everyone's consensus, we need to update projects.yaml. [1] I think that the OSPF to become approval project is to elect PTL, then talk to other PTLs of other projects. [1] https://github.com/openstack/governance/blob/master/reference/projects.yaml Cheers, Shinobu On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 10:40 PM, joehuang <joehu...@huawei.com> wrote: > Hi, Shinobu, > > Many thanks for the check for Tricircle to be an OpenStack project, and > Thierry for the clarification. glad to know that we are close to OpenStack > offical project criteria. > > Let's discuss the initial PTL election in weekly meeting, and start initial > PTL election after that if needed. > > Best Regards > Chaoyi Huang ( joehuang ) > ________________________________________ > From: Shinobu Kinjo [shinobu...@gmail.com] > Sent: 02 May 2016 18:48 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Requirements for becoming > approved official project > > Hi Thierry, > > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 5:45 PM, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> wrote: >> Shinobu Kinjo wrote: >>> >>> I guess, it's usable. [1] [2] [3], probably and more... >>> >>> The reason why still I can just guess is that there is a bunch of >>> documentations!! >>> It's one of great works but too much. >> >> >> We have transitioned most of the documentation off the wiki, but >> there are still a number of pages that are not properly deprecated. >> >>> [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/PTL_Guide >> >> >> This is now mostly replaced by the project team guide, so I marked >> this one as deprecated. > > Honestly, frankly we should clean up something deprecated since there > is a bunch of documentations -; It's really hard to read every singe > piece... > > Anyway better than nothing though. > >> >> As far as initial election goes, if there is a single candidate no >> need to organize a formal election. If you need to run one, you can >> use CIVS >> (http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/) since that is what we use for the >> official >> elections: >> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Election_Officiating_Guidelines > > Thank you for pointing it out. > That is really good advice. > >> >> Regards, >> >> -- >> Thierry Carrez (ttx) >> >> >> _____________________________________________________________________ >> _____ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: >> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > -- > Email: > shin...@linux.com > GitHub: > shinobu-x > Blog: > Life with Distributed Computational System based on OpenSource > > ______________________________________________________________________ > ____ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > ______________________________________________________________________ > ____ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Email: shin...@linux.com shin...@redhat.com __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
