On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Fichter, Dane G. <dane.fich...@jhuapl.edu>
wrote:

> Hi John and Matt,
>
> I actually have a spec and patch up for review addressing some of what
> you’re referring to below.
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/314222/
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/312210/
>
> I think you’re quite right that the existing ImageCacheManager code serves
> little purpose. What I propose here is a cryptographically stronger
> verification meant to protect against both deliberate modification by an
> adversary, as well as accidental sources of disk corruption. If you like, I
> can deprecate the checksum-based verification code in the image cache as a
> part of this change. Feel free me to email me back or ping me on IRC
> (dane-fichter) in order to discuss more.
>

Thanks Dane, reviewed. I don't think the details are right yet, but I do
think this is the way to go. I also think we need to entirely divorce this
functionality from the image cache.

Matt
-- 
Matthew Booth
Red Hat Engineering, Virtualisation Team

Phone: +442070094448 (UK)
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to