On 05/26/2016 11:36 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:


On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Adam Young <ayo...@redhat.com <mailto:ayo...@redhat.com>> wrote:

    Some mix of these three tests is almost always failing:

    gate-keystone-dsvm-functional-nv FAILURE in 20m 04s (non-voting)
    gate-keystone-dsvm-functional-v3-only-nv FAILURE in 32m 45s
    (non-voting)
    gate-tempest-dsvm-keystone-uwsgi-full-nv FAILURE in 1h 07m 53s
    (non-voting)


    Are we going to keep them running and failing, or boot them?  If
    we are going to keep them, who is going to commit to fixing them?

    We should not live with broken windows.



The uwsgi check should be moved to a proper run utilizing mod_proxy_uwsgi.
Who wants to own this? I am not fielding demands for uwsgi support mysqlf, and kind of think it is just a novelty, thus would not mind see it going away. If someone really cares, please make yourself known.


The v3 only one is a WIP that a few folks are working on
Fair enough.

The function-nv one was passing somewhere. I think that one is close.

Yeah, it seems to be intermittant.




__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to