On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:16 AM Moshe Levi <mosh...@mellanox.com> wrote:
> Hi all, > > > > A recent change [1] in tempest broke all Mellanox CIs. > > This is the second time it happened. > > After the first time it happened we decided that Mellanox CI will > comment on tempest. > > On this time I saw that Mellanox CI was commenting on that patch with a > failure but was still got approved - [2] Enabling Mellanox CI as commenting > on tempest requires us physical resources such as servers/NICS because > it tests SR-IOV. > > So I am wandering what can be done in the future to prevent this from > happen again. > A message to the DL is a good way to raise awareness on this. Ensuring the job stability is also important, too many failures will decrease the attention on it - that said I don't have numbers for Mellanox CI failure rates, so it may be that the pass rate is already good enough. > > > Anyway we proposed the following fix to tempest [3] > > Thanks for fixing this, and sorry about the inconvenience. Even with the fix in, the Mellanox CI job failed, which if unfortunate. I issued a re-check. Andrea Frittoli > > > > > [1] - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/320495/ > > [2] - > http://13.69.151.247/95/320495/20/check-sriov-tempest/Tempest-Sriov/825304c/testr_results.html.gz > > [3] - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/330331/ > > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev