On 16 June 2016 at 09:58, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> wrote: > Project team requirements are just guidelines, which are interpreted by > humans. In the end, the TC members vote and use human judgment rather than > blind 'rules'. I just want (1) to state that a level playing field is an > essential part of what we call "open collaboration", and (2) to have TC > members *consider* whether the project presents a fair playing field or not, > as part of how they judge future project teams.
FWIW, I think this is what wins me over. These are just guidelines to be considered by humans. > There is a grey area that requires human judgment here. In your example > above, if the open implementation was unusable open core bait to lure people > into using the one and only proprietary driver, it would be a problem. If > the open implementation was fully functional and nothing prevented adding > additional proprietary drivers, there would be no problem. This answers a lot of the questions I had after reading the idea. Along with the fact this is only about official projects. Thanks, johnthetubaguy __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
