Thanks for the update Joe. Let's start the discussion on the mailing list please.
-- Dims On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 1:34 AM, Keen, Joe <[email protected]> wrote: > Davanum, > We started work on getting Monasca into the global requirements with two > reviews [1] [2] that add gate jobs and check requirements jobs for the > Monasca repositories. Some repositories are being adapted to use versions > of libraries that OpenStack currently accepts [3] and we¹re looking at the > libraries we use that are not currently part of OpenStack and seeing if > they¹re worth trying to add to the global requirements. We¹re hoping to > be able to start adding the global requirements reviews within a week or > two. > > We definitely want to talk with the oslo.messaging team and explain the > ways we use Kafka and what effects the move to the 1.x versions of the > library has on us. I¹ve attempted to contact the oslo.messaging team in > the oslo IRC channel to see if we can talk about this at a weekly meeting > but I wasn¹t able to connect with anyone. Would you prefer that > conversation happen on the mailing list here or could we add that topic to > the next weekly meeting? > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/316293/ > [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/323567/ > [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/323598/ > > On 6/21/16, 6:53 AM, "Davanum Srinivas" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>Roland Hochmuth, Joe Keen, >> >>The oslo.messaging folks have been trying off and on again [1] to get >>to python-kafka 1.x. Right now they are waiting on the Monasca team as >>we reverted python-kafka 1.x in [2] for the Monasca Team. >> >>I still don't see a review for adding Monasca to projects.txt which is >>concerning. Is there work being done to get to that point? >> >>The oslo.messaging team will file a review to update to 1.x again when >>they are ready, when that happens, we will end up breaking Monasca CI >>jobs again. Unless of course Monasca is in projects.txt by that time >>and adhering to requirements. >> >>If both oslo.messaging and Monasca are under requirements, we still >>need a way to move forward together. So please treat this email thread >>as an opportunity to talk to each other :) Which should have started >>ideally when we did [2] >> >>Thanks, >>Dims >> >>[1] >>https://review.openstack.org/#/q/kafka+project:openstack/oslo.messaging+NO >>T+is:merged+NOT+is:abandoned >>[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/316259/ >> >>-- >>Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims >> >>__________________________________________________________________________ >>OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe >>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
