On 21/06/16 12:12 -0600, Doug Wiegley wrote:
On Jun 21, 2016, at 11:29 AM, Jay Pipes <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote:
[snip]
Perhaps you weren't around for the endless (and pointless) discussions around what is "the core of OpenStack"? Or you weren't around for the endless (and conflicting, contradictory, and religious) battles that were waged during the old "incubation" and "graduation" procedures? Ask Clint, Flavio and Devananda how fruitful the Marconi/Zaqar "architectural review" by the TC was.That would be interesting to hear, and how this group would avoid and/or help such issues.
This is actually a good example that not only involved the TC but also folks from outside the TC. A clear sign of collaboration between people interested in the topic, folks involved in the governance model and folks actually working in the project. Most of the discussions are googlable but here's one that came out of the good all graduation discussion[0]. What we saw in those discussions was effectively a WG in full action working with the TC. I wish we'd have had a better structure for such group back then but we had a bigger problem to solve. [0] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-September/044845.html [long snip] Flavio -- @flaper87 Flavio Percoco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
