Kashyap Chamarthy <kcham...@redhat.com> writes: > If it reduces nondeterministic spam for the CI Infra, and makes us > achieve the task at hand, sure. [/me need to educate himself a > bit more on the Zuul pipeline infrastructure.] > > Worth filing this (and your 'idle pipeline' thought below) in the Zuul > tracker here? > > https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/679 > >> In the past we've discussed the option of having an "idle pipeline" >> which repeatedly runs specified jobs only when there are unused >> resources available, so that it doesn't significantly cut into our >> resource pool when we're under high demand but still allows to >> automatically collect a large amount of statistical data. >> >> Anyway, hopefully James Blair can weigh in on this, since Zuul is >> basically in a feature freeze for a while to limit the number of >> significant changes we'll need to forward-port into the v3 branch. >> We'd want to discuss these new features in the context of Zuul v3 >> instead.
Yes, I think there is more that we can do around having specific jobs run, and also more types of pipeline managers that understand load conditions -- or at least more fine-grained priority specification so they don't have to. But I also think what Jeremy said is correct -- we're in the middle of a push toward Zuul v3 and need to stay focused on that. These are good suggestions with well articulated use-cases, so I think adding this to the issue tracker for now so that we can address it later is the thing to do. -Jim __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
