On 07/18/2016 10:03 PM, Diana Clarke wrote: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Andreas Jaeger <a...@suse.com> wrote: >> In general, I think coverage jobs should be run as check job so >> that you know how the coverage changes. Running them only in the post >> job means that in practice nobody sees the output of the job. > > I look at the post queue coverage output for nova, and have often > wished I could see the check queue coverage results. +1 for moving it > to the check queue.
You're welcome to send a patch for openstack-infra/project-config repo and update zuul/layout.yaml to add the job to the check queue of nova. >> Here're the failures (including some that run successful but coverage >> >> nova: >> http://logs.openstack.org/3f/3f700b5a5a498ba08e77378d34f059c3fa6845d8/post/nova-coverage-db/2bdabf8/ > > I suspect you can cross nova off your list of failures soon. I believe > those errors were addressed by the following: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1603979 > > Here's a recent passing coverage run for nova (from before those > errors were introduced): > > > http://logs.openstack.org/1a/1a074a72845d812666a904b9c17289a43bb32062/post/nova-coverage-db/2fe5506/cover/ Glad to see! I didn't dig deeper, just looked at today's status, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev