On 19/07/16 03:31, Steve Martinelli wrote: > I think the change you posted could very much just > replace the existing password plugin in keystone ( > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/343422/) and not be it's own plugin. > > How about a specification instead? > https://github.com/openstack/keystone-specs :) > It's unlikely to land in Newton, but would be a candidate for O. >
Will do. I'll edit my patch/blueprint to be clear that this is a replacement for password that does not affect normal username/password functionality, just adds MFA support, and write a spec for the O release. :) Although looking at that repo, since there isn't a folder yet for O, should I just throw it in ongoing? As for your gerrit comments: > Is there a reason you created totp_password plugin and not just added to the existing password plugin?" Mainly I wasn't sure if this was something people wanted and I didn't want to propose replacing the default password auth module as I thought an optional second plugin would be easier to get people to approve. Turns out I was wrong! __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev