+1 I was reluctant to repo split by Newton timeframe as it was crucial time to our project, people will start using it, and I didn't want to cause needless confusion. Now time is right imho.
On 20 July 2016 at 15:48, Ryan Hallisey <rhall...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hello. > > The repo split discussion that started at summit was brought up again at the > midcycle. > The discussion was focused around splitting the Docker containers and Ansible > code into > two separate repos [1]. > > One of the main opponents to the split is backports. Backports will need to > be done > by hand for a few releases. So far, there hasn't been a ton of backports, > but that could > always change. > > As for splitting, it provides a much clearer view of what pieces of the > project are where. > Kolla-ansible with its own repo will sit along side kolla-kubernetes as > consumers of the > kolla repo. > > The target for the split will be for day 1 of Occata. The core team will vote > on > the change of splitting kolla into kolla-ansible and kolla. > > Cores please respond with a +1/-1 to approve or disapprove the repo split. > Any community > member feel free to weigh in with your opinion. > > +1 > -Ryan > > [1] - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kolla-N-midcycle-repo-split > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev