On 23/07/16 00:15, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > Hi folks, > > At the midcycle we decided to push off implementing Monitoring until > post Newton. The rationale for this decision was that the core review > team has enough on their plates and nobody was super keen to implement > any monitoring solution given our other priorities. > > Like all good things, communities produce new folks that want to do new > things, and Sensu was proposed as Kolla's monitoring solution (atleast > the first one). A developer that has done some good work has shown up > to do the job as well :) I have heard good things about Sensu, minus > the fact that it is implemented in Ruby and I fear it may end up causing > our gate a lot of hassle.
On a side note, we just founded a SIG in CentOS to bring in logging and monitoring tools[1]. You were mentioning two different tasks: One is availability monitoring, which we are doing with sensu/uchiwa For performance monitoring there as a chain of collectd - graphite - grafana. Instead of graphite, one could use gnocchi[2] through a plugin. These mentioned tools are implemented in Ruby(sensu/uchiwa), Go/Nodejs(Grafana) and C (collectd). Graphite is a Django app. [1] https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/OpsTools [2] http://docs.openstack.org/developer/gnocchi/grafana.html -- Matthias Runge <mru...@redhat.com> Red Hat GmbH, http://www.de.redhat.com/, Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Michael Cunningham, Michael O'Neill, Eric Shander __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev